The resistance between +HT and chassis was measured to be 4,6 kohm, a much too low value and responsible for the high
current. By breaking up the anode chain in some strategic places I soon found that capacitor 11-6 had a short, grounding
resistor 57-3/first IF. As the resistor is 4,7 kohm this was the cause of the low resistance between +HT and chassis. The
capacitor was changed to a vintage Aerovox 0,05 uF 400 VDCW. The resistance to chassis was now 27 kohm which is
quite resonable. How the receiver could give any response with such a fault is a riddle, it should be quite dead really!
The HT current now was 45 mA at 215 - 225 V and the receiver was quite lively on all bands. Now I checked all
the resistances and voltages at the valve pins and compared with the tables in the manual. Both measurements showed a couple
of serious faults: The screen grid resistance and voltage on the mixer and also on the first IF was 0! The screen grid voltages
on the first and second RF stages as well as on the second and third IF was only 50 V instead of more then 80 V. The fault
was the decoupling capacitor of the mixer screen grid 11-5 which was shorted. I changed it to an Aerovox 0,05 uF 250 VDCW.
The screen grid resistor on IF 3 was 480 kohm instead of 180 kohm, it was changed.
Report 3 March 15th: Change of output valve, resoldering of the heater chain
A batch of NOS spare valves were bought at Radio Daze in New York, www.radiodaze.com, and on eBay. They cost only $4
as an average and a few dollars postage. The valve 6Y6G was changed to the original 6K6(GT) which takes only 0,3 A LT
current compared to 1,4 A for 6Y6. The dynamotor fed a negativ grid voltage to the valve in the original circuit, this has to be
substituted with a cathode voltage. As I do not need much power I decided to use the lowest voltages in the data sheet, 100 V
anode and screen grid voltage and 10 V on the cathode, current 10 mA. I got this through a 10 kohm 2W resistor for the
anode/screen grid and a 1 kohm resistor decoupled with 100 uF for the cathode. The entire receiver now took only 32 mA at
220 V!
The filament chain was badly soldered when changed from 24 to 6,3 V, I changed some wires and went over the solder
joints.
Listening tests gave a very good result on the 49 and 31 m bands. The AVC voltage varied from 0 to -10 V
with the signal strength and the MVC was 33 to 0 V with the volume control, very good. The BFO and crystal filter worked fine.
The receiver is now in place in the collection and I will make listening tests a week or two. The next steps will then be to plot
the IF curve and measure and perhaps trim the sensitivity on all bands.
Report 4 April 4th: Testing and fine alignment of the IF
A 1 mV ptp signal from a signal generator tuned to the receiver intermediate frequency 915 kHz was connected to the mixer grid
with a 100 nF capacitor. The signal was modulated to 30 % with 400 Hz. The frequency was varied and the output was measured
at the headphone output.
First the frequency of the crystal filter was checked to be 915.00 kHz. All IF circuits were then aligned to that frequency, the
output increased nearly 20%.
With the crystal filter OUT the bandwidth was measured to around 5.6 kHz (+- 2.8 kHz)
@ - 3 dB and around 14 kHz (+- 7 kHz) @ - 20 dB. With the crystal filter IN the bandwidth was 400 Hz (+- 200 Hz)
@ - 3 dB and 3 kHz (+- 1.5 kHz) @ - 20 dB (specified to +- 2 kHz).
With 1 mV ptp input the output was 12 V ptp, which is 1 mW in 20 kohm, the amplification in the mixer/IF/AF stages being
around 12000.
Report 5 March 28th: Check and alignment of the frequency accuracy (the oscillator alignment)
A signal generator and counter was connected to the aerial input over a 100 pF capacitor as dummy antenna. The frequency
was measured at the dial end points on all bands. All the four upper bands 3 – 6 are better then the specified tolerance (0.5 %).
Band 1 has 1.4 % fault at 500 kHz, will be aligned, and band 2 is very inaccurate (up to 5 %!), will be examined and corrected later.
My BC-348-R in its collector environment! It remains to repair band 2 and to repaint the front panel.
Report 6 October 1st 2009: Repainting the front panel
The front panel was removed and the text masked with tape. The outer layer of paint was removed with a chemical paint remover,
applied in very thin coats. The underlying wrinkle paint structure was thereby saved. Finally the panel was sprayed with
two thin coats of mat black paint.
The plastic identification plate was original but in bad shape with paint and pieces missing. The paint on the back of
the plastic sheet was retouched and the plastic sheet was then glued to a thin white aluminum plate. Missing pieces were replaced.
The identification plate now looked fairly good and was riveted in place.
Two service stamps to the left of the plate were
taped during the paint process and thus saved.